Our Legal Insights Blog

Earlier this month, S&P cut Aston Martin's senior secured notes to CCC, revising the recovery rating on the notes from 3 to 5. That revision halves S&P's recovery estimate, from 50% to 25%, and the stated basis tracks back to what this situation has been teaching on the covenants since July: the new £550m financing ranks ahead of the notes in the recovery waterfall at the point of hypothetical default, diluting recovery prospects for existing holders.

Vitamin Well, backed by Cinven and Bridgepoint, launched a cross-currency term loan this month. IFR reported on July 23rd that the borrower had proposed a disqualified counsel provision in the term loan, and that lenders pushed back hard enough that it came out before allocation. It's described as the first attempt at the term in Europe, about a year after it appeared in US broadly syndicated deals.

On July 22nd, Aston Martin raised £450m of new senior secured debt from funds managed by HPS. A noteholder group holding more than half of the roughly $1.8bn-equivalent of notes had previously organized under a cooperation agreement, advised by Akin Gump. Then, on July 21st, a bondholder letter sent through Quinn Emanuel demanded the company stop the transaction within 48 hours; the company announced the financing as closed the next day.

Victoria plc has been refinancing its €166.6 million 3.75% senior secured notes due March 2028. Three announcements between July 8th and 23rd changed what a holder who refused it would receive.

PitchBook reports private credit lenders negotiating ownership structures at origination - stacked holding companies above the borrower - so a future debt-for-equity conversion can run through a top-layer foreclosure and a clean sale below it. Cheap to ask for and easy to miss on review; the mechanics and the review points are inside.

Six years after the 2020 exchange, the Serta Simmons uptier has a price. The current fight is over whether the market gets to read the itemized version.

The Serta Simmons litigation produced its most consequential document-level ruling on July 7th, and the number that came out the other end - $400m and change - is worth the attention of anyone who structures or advises on leveraged loans.

I've watched Payments for Consent disappear from the levfin covenant package for years, and I'll admit it broke my heart a little - deal by deal, it was like watching a slow car crash. So the recent New York ruling in the Hunkemöller uptier made my day because I saw the covenant I once loved doing its job.